top of page

Fake Bylines Have Opinion Editors on Alert. Here's How Real Leaders Still Get Published.

19 hours ago
8 min read

After AI-built "journalists" slipped nearly 100 articles into real outlets, newspapers are adding identity checks, AI attestations and tighter local rules for op-eds and letters. Here's what superintendents, police chiefs, mayors, nonprofit leaders, attorneys and business owners need to know before they hit send.


By Caron Communications Staff


Key Takeaways


  • Fake columnists are now cheap to build. OpenAI reported on Oct. 8 that seven invented "journalist" personas placed almost 100 articles in small and medium outlets.

  • Editors are responding with friction. Some now require a call, an in-person meeting, a photo, local ties or an attestation that no AI was used.

  • Real leaders feel it, too. An author an editor can't quickly verify now looks like a risk.

  • Ghostwriting is not the same as a fake byline, but rules on AI help vary widely by outlet. Read the current guidelines every time.

  • Election week raises the stakes. Some papers cut off election letters days before Nov. 3, and editors are screening harder.


The opinion page has always run on trust. An editor reads a pitch and takes a chance that the person behind it is real.


This fall, that trust got expensive.


On Oct. 8, OpenAI said it had banned ChatGPT accounts tied to an Iran-origin influence campaign it calls "Bogus Bylines." The operators used seven fake bylines to pitch long-form articles about the U.S.-Iran conflict. OpenAI identified almost 100 articles published or syndicated under those names.


One landed in a weekly newspaper in Gulf County, Florida, a county of about 15,000 people. The publisher of the Port St. Joe Star told The Washington Post the column came from a small Oregon group that had been sending him content for years, so he didn't feel a need to verify the author.


If you lead a school district, police department, town, nonprofit, law firm or small business, this is your problem, too. The opinion page is one of the few places you can make your case in your own words, and editors are now looking harder at every unfamiliar name, including yours.


How AI Made Fake Columnists Easy


Fake writers aren't new. What changed is the cost. According to OpenAI, the operators asked ChatGPT to check drafts against a specific outlet's submission criteria, then write the pitch email to the editor. Some personas were backed by social media accounts.


OpenAI also noted that across the 30 covert influence operations it has exposed since early 2024, the ones that land content in real media outlets "tend to have the highest potential reach and impact." A byline in a real newspaper borrows that paper's credibility.


The same pattern surfaced in Canada. On Sept. 24, Policy Options editor-in-chief Les Perreaux pulled an article by a contributor calling himself Daniel Robson after the magazine could not independently verify his identity. Perreaux said he had relied too heavily on the writer's earlier bylines elsewhere, "a form of trust cascade in which publication itself becomes a credential."


Five days later, the Ottawa Citizen said it had removed three pieces it had published under the same name in 2025. Its editor-in-chief wrote that his headshot and his writing appeared to be AI-generated, according to online analysis tools.


In April, the Mississippi Free Press took down a column after its opinion editor noticed an invoice didn't match the writer's name. The writer's social links were dead, and the headshot was AI-generated.


Person in a light blue shirt writing notes in a notebook beside an open laptop on a white desk
Photo: JESHOOTS.COM / Wikimedia Commons (via Unsplash) (CC0)

How Opinion Pages Are Changing the Rules


There is no industry standard. Each outlet is writing its own rules, often after getting burned.


Proof that you're real


The Ottawa Citizen now considers opinion pitches only from writers who are based in Ottawa or spend time there, and who agree to meet a staff journalist in person and pose for a photo.


Policy Options still welcomes first-time writers, but when one lacks "a substantial, independently verifiable professional record," it will take extra steps to confirm identity and expertise. Failure to disclose AI use means the piece won't run.


The group that supplied the Florida column told the Post it will now require a Zoom meeting if that writer submits again.


A promise that no AI was used


On Sept. 30, Spokane's Spokesman-Review adopted a strict no-AI policy for letters and guest opinions after reports that many recent guest pieces appeared to be fully or partly AI-written. Letter writers must check a mandatory box attesting that AI was not used. Suspicious pieces go through an AI detector.


When Nieman Lab asked editors at 24 prominent newspapers in August whether they'd follow The Wall Street Journal in accepting AI-assisted op-eds, none of those who replied would. USA Today told Nieman Lab it doesn't accept submissions written with any help beyond basic spelling and grammar checks. The Chicago Tribune has contributors attest they didn't use AI.


Detectors aren't a cure. The Mississippi Free Press editor wrote that "AI detectors aren't very reliable," and The Oregonian's opinion editor told Nieman Lab the same. A real person's piece can get flagged, and the burden falls on the writer.


Local voices, real names, one outlet at a time


Many papers are leaning harder into local. The Grant County Herald in Minnesota spelled out its election-season rules: a phone number to verify every letter writer, no AI-generated letters, no mass-produced letters sent to multiple papers, and no letters submitted by PACs, advocacy groups or PR firms on a reader's behalf.


Closer to home, CT Mirror's CT Viewpoints submission form asks for a contributor's organization or hometown, email and phone number, and has a place to upload a headshot. It also won't publish third-party endorsements of candidates.


Search engines are watching, too


Google's guidance for site owners now calls fabricated creator profiles, including AI-generated headshots and made-up names, a form of deception and "a signal of a low-quality page." Verifiable authorship matters on your own website, too. We explain why in AI Search Is Rewriting Your Reputation.


What This Means for Your Organization


The checks target fake people, but they slow down unprepared real ones, too.


School districts


Superintendents and board chairs often write to explain a budget, referendum or safety change. Expect an editor to confirm the author directly, not just through a communications office, and keep leadership bios current online.


Police and public safety


A chief's op-ed after a high-profile incident will be read closely. Have the chief available for a short call, match every fact to the public record, and never get ahead of what the department can confirm.


Municipal leaders


Mayors and first selectmen can use the opinion page to explain a decision in full sentences instead of sound bites. With editors favoring local voices, a clear local stake is an advantage.


Campaigns and candidates


Election Day is Nov. 3, and AI is already a flashpoint. The Wesleyan Media Project identified at least 220 ads produced or enhanced with AI by candidates or PACs this cycle, costing just under $137 million. Expect campaign letters to be checked harder, and know that some papers set cutoffs before Election Day. The Spokesman-Review's last day for election letters is Oct. 27.


Nonprofit advocates


Op-eds and letters are core advocacy tools, but near-identical letters from supporters can be rejected as mass-produced. Help supporters tell their own stories instead of handing them a template.


Attorneys


Lawyers bring expertise editors value, but commentary touching active matters deserves extra care. Weigh your professional obligations and your client's interests before you pitch, and keep your firm bio current.


Small businesses and creators


Bylines in trade and local publications still build credibility. A reviewed column carries far more weight than a post on an open platform.


Person writing in a notebook on a wooden desk beside a laptop, a camera, a black notebook and a pen
Photo: Brad Neathery / Wikimedia Commons (via Unsplash) (CC0)

Ghostwriting vs. Fake Bylines: Where the Line Is


Many leaders get help writing op-eds, and that has long been accepted.


The Oregonian's opinion editor told Nieman Lab that businesses, nonprofits and government agencies frequently have paid communications staff write op-eds for their leaders, and "We don't have an issue with that."


The fake-byline cases are different: the named author didn't exist or wasn't who he claimed to be.


Our standard is simple:


  • The named author is real and reachable by the editor.

  • The ideas and arguments are theirs. They approve every line and can defend it on the phone.

  • Every fact is sourced and checkable.

  • AI use follows the outlet's rules. If the paper bans it, don't use it to draft. If you're unsure, ask.


That matters. New York Focus ran 54 recent op-eds by New York politicians through an AI detection tool, and the majority were flagged for having at least some AI-generated text. If you're a public official, assume someone may check.


A Pre-Submission Checklist for Real Leaders


  1. Read the outlet's current guidelines. Policies are changing fast.

  2. Make the author reachable. Offer a direct phone number and availability for a short video call.

  3. Send a real, recent headshot. AI-generated or AI-flagged headshots turned up in the Canadian, Mississippi and Florida cases.

  4. Keep a verifiable record. An official bio page, a current LinkedIn profile and links to past coverage help an editor confirm you quickly.

  5. Lead with a local stake. Explain why you are the right person to make this argument here.

  6. Pitch one outlet at a time. Many papers want exclusive pieces, and copies sent to several papers can disqualify you.

  7. Source every claim. Link to the budget, the report or the public record. Facts that can't be verified won't survive an edit.

  8. Respect the calendar. Know election-letter cutoffs.

  9. Verify who's asking, too. If a "reporter" you can't find anywhere asks for comment, check before you answer.


Have something to say and want it to land? Book a free consultation with Caron Communications. We help leaders shape, write and place op-eds that are verifiably theirs.


Why Newsroom Experience Matters Here


Caron Communications is a locally owned boutique media and PR firm in Wethersfield, Connecticut, founded in February 2025 by Matt Caron, a former FOX61/CW20 news anchor, chief investigator and political reporter who previously worked at WWLP 22News and earned three Emmy nominations.


We know how editors think because we've worked in newsrooms. Our team brings more than 20 years of experience, works 100% in-house with no subcontractors, and offers 24/7 on-call support on a retainer or project basis. Our Services include media relations, strategic communications, legislative and policy support, training and professional development, and multilingual translation services. Learn more in Our Story.


Want to be heard beyond the printed page? A podcast lets audiences hear you make your case yourself. See our podcast production and studio space rental options, and why authenticity still wins. For the bigger picture, read about news deserts.


Frequently Asked Questions


Can I use AI to help write an op-ed?


It depends on the outlet. Many major papers, including USA Today and The Boston Globe, don't accept AI-generated text, and some require you to attest you didn't use it. Check the current guidelines first.


Is a ghostwritten op-ed the same as a fake byline?


No. A fake byline involves an author who doesn't exist or misrepresents who they are. A real leader who shapes, approves and can defend a piece drafted with help is a real author, though each outlet sets its own rules on assistance and disclosure.


Why would a newspaper ask me for a call, a meeting or a headshot?


To confirm you are who you say you are. After fake contributors fooled several outlets, some editors now verify identity directly. A quick answer keeps your piece moving.


What's the difference between an op-ed and a letter to the editor?


An op-ed is a longer argument from someone with a stake or expertise. A letter is shorter and often responds to something the paper published. Both face tighter checks now.


How can Caron Communications help?


We help leaders develop, write, fact-check and place opinion pieces, and we prepare them for editor questions. Schedule a free consultation, browse more Insights or read our FAQs.


Your voice, your words, your name. Caron Communications helps you make your case in print, on air and online. Book your free consultation, call 860.800.2023 or explore our studio booking options.

Comments


bottom of page